Bytes Discovers the Hidden Gems of its Service Desk with ICCM Solutions

As modern enterprises grow, so does the complexity of their IT systems in supporting their business activities; something which was recognised by South Africa’s leading systems integrator, Bytes Systems Integration. As a direct result of needing to streamline and improve its customer support operations, and recognising the business’ need to create value added services to its product portfolio, Bytes embarked on the deployment of a progressive IT service management strategy with ICCM Solutions.

What is fascinating about Bytes’ strategic service improvement programme is that it is being pioneered by the Financial Director, Brad Fraser.

Fraser identified a number of new business opportunities within the Bytes Group as well as undertaking a technology review of the service management processes, behaviours and working practices.

Bytes had become aware of its own requirements to rationalise its client support systems. Each business unit had its own way of operating, applications and software, which needed to be incorporated into the combined Bytes infrastructure and supported in a centralised model. This segmented approach had arisen as a direct result of the organisation’s growth strategy through company acquisitions, resulting in a complex IT infrastructure and client support matrix.

Through ICCM’s e-Service Desk, Bytes established a progressive service management strategy. In addition, Bytes also initiated a technology strategy that has helped the company differentiate itself from competitors by creating new services for its product portfolio. As a result, the solution has enabled Bytes to generate new revenue opportunities.

Fraser, an experienced executive, is responsible for the financial direction of the business as well as the operational support systems. This ensures there is a continued focus on value, efficiency and vision, something which Fraser believes he has seen in this project.

He says, “Obviously having an ITIL aligned service desk that operates smoothly is our immediate priority, but we see ICCM’s e-Service Desk being utilised across a number of different business units, effectively streamlining far more processes than we had originally anticipated. Our service management strategy has taken on a new direction which we are delighted to drive forward, particularly as it will help generate new revenue opportunities for the company.

“We have been able to distinguish between ‘incident management’ supported by SLA’s and ‘change requests’, which require additional effort and scoping. This has enabled Bytes to generate revenue from the change requests that were previously dealt with under ‘problem management’. Other revenue opportunities are developing by offering e-Service Desk as a ‘Managed Service’ to existing clients who do not wish to establish their own Service Desks.”

Bringing Together Offerings
The company needed a solution that encompassed and integrated the business intelligence that had gathered. The largest problem was ensuring the management of the clients’ IT infrastructure was correct. Many different business managers needed to be able to use the technology, all with different skills, service sets, needs and priorities.

Fraser explains, “We needed to revolutionise the way our business operated. A number of strategic acquisitions in South Africa led to a range of different systems that had been inherited and utilised without a common approach. In order to maintain a smooth running of the client support systems, it was necessary to overhaul the service strategy, design and continual service improvement processes – and not just to cope with the current requirements, but to future proof.”

During the technology selection, each manager was asked for input into the process and base their decision on the results that could be generated from each solution – not just the technology. Bytes needed a solution that would not only satisfy requirements on a tactical level, but actually solve problems they were thinking about. Nine out of the ten managers voted to implement the ICCM e-Service Desk solution.

Hidden Gems
At the outset Bytes’ key driver in this service improvement project was the standardisation of its many service desks. In reality ICCM’s offering gave much more than this. Bytes soon realised the e-Service Desk solution offered a return on investment far beyond its original remit.

The solution has enabled Bytes to implement value added services and differentiate itself from key competitors in seven key ways:
• total transparency of service;
• bespoke client support;
• proactive support and disaster avoidance;
• business continuity;
• bespoke SLA agreement levels;
• consolidated view of data and third party information; and
• the use of a portal to up-sell products and services.

By using the solution to its full advantage the company is offering improvements in its service and product portfolios and creating new business opportunities. As a result Bytes will be turning the client support function into a revenue-generating unit, rather than just cost-centre.

This has been achieved by allowing recognition of non-billable calls to billable calls. Anecdotally, the team has found that for larger customers, requests would be generated through the service desk. Previously, requests were undertaken without question because the particular customer was important. The priority for the service team was to keep the customer rather than ensuring the request was justified and could be completed within the service level agreement. Now, each request is logged and, by implementing this process, the revenue opportunities have been identified.

The entrepreneurial spirit of the organisation has also shown through during the process of moving from a cost centre to a profit centre – the business managers are now identifying new opportunities to generate additional revenue streams from the business intelligence obtained through ICCM.

A Return On Investment
Whilst Bytes has seen a return on investment beyond its initial expectations, the hidden gems of the e-Service Desk solution are central to Bytes’ key consideration during its purchasing decision: value.

Fraser says, “ICCM is a beautiful fit; we can literally change almost any parameter and it adapts accordingly, due to the operational platform based on Business Process Management. And it’s not just about delivering service management process deployment, it enables us to demonstrate clear operational business value, efficiency and return on investment. Without a doubt, this is the most effective solution I have ever worked with.”

“Many companies make claims in the market about their solutions but ICCM has propelled our service management, a core business process management function that delivers full business technology integration in line with our requirements and objectives. We’ve benefited enormously across every single business unit.”

The Difference Between Workflow and BPM…

ICCM had an excellent show in Dallas, Texas at the ITSMF USA Fusion09 conference.  There was a lot of interest and buzz about our solution, e-Service Desk.  It also highlighted for us the need to continue to raise awareness and education in areas that on the surface, appear equivalent, but in reality are very, very different.  During the many demonstrations, several Fusion09 attendees asked us; “What exactly is the difference between BPM and Workflow?”.  The obvious observation was that they were one in the same.  This is simply not the case as you will see below. 

Every BPMS (Business Process Management Suite) and BPM (Business Process Management) solution set on the market have in common key differentiators from the “embedded workflow” often found within applications.  Some of these differences include;

  • Embedded, application based workflow is usually application-specific sequencing of pre-defined activities (ie. in an ITSM context, Change Management workflow is just Change Management)
  • Embedded, application based workflow rarely interacts with external processes, systems or data sources
  • Embedded, application based workflow often leverages proprietary graphics, execution language, etc
  • Embedded, application based workflow effectively provides the ability to choose  the specific order of execution of pre-built activity steps

The purpose of this article isn’t to contrast application specific workflow to BPM in a negative context.  Application based workflow can and is often implemented as a subset of BPM.  The original premise of BPM was to manage and coordinate processes executed in other technologies and on different systems as well as within itself.  The initiatiation, monitoring and termination can be integrated at any point in the process to any application.  BPM allows us to design and execute business process systems without being subject to the constraints of a single application or single location.

One of the value propositions of BPM is how it is often leveraged at an enterprise level to deliver processes and services beyond the company firewall.  Quite often this ability is a driver for BPM within an organization.  This enables processes to extend to and include remote company locations, supply chain and business partners, and agents of your organization.  In this context, there are some other less obvious, but important distinctions of BPM over embedded workflow;

  • BPM inherently provides diverse integration and technology support as business and supply chain partners always have different technologies.
  • BPM provides the ability to vary process descriptions locally while keeping common touch points for systems to enable collaboration.
  • Most BPM Suites typically can leverage industry standards such as BPEL, XPDL, and BPMN

As stated in my previous post; “Optimizing IT with BPM”.  The basic value proposition of BPM is the ability to enable business (or IT) processes with less effort and cost, with higher quality than traditional means. In fact, BPM is intended to respond to the following set of business values;  Agility – The ability to bring new products and services to market more quickly and adapt processes more effectively to changing market demands; Efficiencies – Most processes are inefficient due to manual effort, poor hand-offs between departments and a general inability to monitor overall progress. The deployment of BPM solutions helps to eliminate these problems. The efficiency benefits are typically expressed in the reduced number of Full Time Employee’s (FTE’s) required to perform particular tasks; and Visibility – Providing management insight into process-based performance indicators. This enables an organization to make better business decisions and handle exceptions better.

Gartner research indicates that even without process redesign, a basic investment in a BPM suite yields significant returns. By simply “making the current-state handoffs, timing and responsibilities explicit, productivity improvements of more than 12 percent are normally realized[2]”. In another report, Gartner indicates that 78% of projects see an internal rate of return (IRR) of greater than 15%.  The same report indicates that these projects were deployed in very quick order (67% in less than six months, 50% in less than four months).   How are these kind of results consistently possible? Once you understand how BPM works, it becomes clear;

  • The ability to design process in a graphical (non-technical) way by the business process owner or analyst;
  • The ability of the application to easily integrate with a wide range of data sources and supporting systems, with bi-directional data sharing;
  • The ability to quickly execute a new process for evaluation, a facility to “roll back” an executed process if you get it wrong, without having to do clean-ups to data etc. 

In a survey conducted in 2007 by Forrester Research of ITIL adopters in 2007 67% believed they were benefiting from adoption but only 4% reported having means in place to measure that success!  Only 9% of respondents could even link the process changes to performance improvements,  75% could not link process maturity to performance improvements!

When you take the technical capability of BPM, and drive it with a process framework such as ITIL, you end up with a unique, extraordinary solution that is as mature as any company needs, has an inherent roadmap built-in for future process and service integrations, but most importantly, provides the process management and measurement that so many companies have been longing for with their ITSM program. 

In summary;

  1. BPM is the definition, improvement and execution of an automated process
  2. BPM is rarely limited by technical constraints, and can be used to rapidly deploy solutions within, across and between organizations
  3. BPM is flexible enough to quickly adapt to changing business needs without requiring changes to the underlying technology
  4. BPM is flexible enough to allow changes in the underlying technology without requiring changes to the business process being  executed

Special thanks to David Elliott of ICCM Solutions Ltd for providing much of the content above.  He shares a Business Process Modeling and IT Management background like myself.